\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
\n
\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
\n
\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a post dated January 3, 2026, also expressed alarm \u2014 though from a different ideological angle \u2014 calling the operation a \u201cclear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Is this intervention really about oil?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a post dated January 3, 2026, also expressed alarm \u2014 though from a different ideological angle \u2014 calling the operation a \u201cclear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cHow does this end?\u201d Schiff asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is this intervention really about oil?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a post dated January 3, 2026, also expressed alarm \u2014 though from a different ideological angle \u2014 calling the operation a \u201cclear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Among Schiff\u2019s questions were: What happens if Venezuela\u2019s<\/a> remaining leadership refuses to cooperate? Will military assets be used to secure oil infrastructure? How would Washington respond if China or Russia cite this precedent to justify their own military actions abroad? And, critically, what is the exit strategy?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHow does this end?\u201d Schiff asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is this intervention really about oil?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a post dated January 3, 2026, also expressed alarm \u2014 though from a different ideological angle \u2014 calling the operation a \u201cclear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Senator Adam Schiff raised an even broader set of questions, accusing the administration of avoiding transparency. In a detailed statement, Schiff demanded answers on how Trump plans to govern Venezuela, whether US troops would be deployed, and how the United States intends to control the country\u2019s oil resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among Schiff\u2019s questions were: What happens if Venezuela\u2019s<\/a> remaining leadership refuses to cooperate? Will military assets be used to secure oil infrastructure? How would Washington respond if China or Russia cite this precedent to justify their own military actions abroad? And, critically, what is the exit strategy?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHow does this end?\u201d Schiff asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is this intervention really about oil?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a post dated January 3, 2026, also expressed alarm \u2014 though from a different ideological angle \u2014 calling the operation a \u201cclear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

What is Trump\u2019s actual plan for Venezuela?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Senator Adam Schiff raised an even broader set of questions, accusing the administration of avoiding transparency. In a detailed statement, Schiff demanded answers on how Trump plans to govern Venezuela, whether US troops would be deployed, and how the United States intends to control the country\u2019s oil resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among Schiff\u2019s questions were: What happens if Venezuela\u2019s<\/a> remaining leadership refuses to cooperate? Will military assets be used to secure oil infrastructure? How would Washington respond if China or Russia cite this precedent to justify their own military actions abroad? And, critically, what is the exit strategy?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHow does this end?\u201d Schiff asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is this intervention really about oil?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a post dated January 3, 2026, also expressed alarm \u2014 though from a different ideological angle \u2014 calling the operation a \u201cclear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greene said Americans are increasingly \u201cdisgusted\u201d by what she described as endless US military aggression driven by foreign economic interests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she wrote, linking the intervention to fears of future regime-change wars and warning that US taxpayers are ultimately forced to bear the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is Venezuela\u2019s oil sector so politically charged?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Venezuela holds the world\u2019s largest proven oil reserves and about 17% of global reserves, according to the Energy Institute. Yet its production has collapsed over decades of nationalisation, corruption, sanctions, and underinvestment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country nationalised its oil industry roughly 50 years ago and fully seized remaining private operations in 2007. Chevron stayed under revised terms, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exited and later won billions of dollars in compensation through international arbitration. Venezuela has yet to fully pay those awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has repeatedly accused Caracas of stealing American wealth and property and confirmed that a full US embargo on Venezuelan oil remains in place \u2014 even as he suggests American firms will soon reclaim and operate the reserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much would it cost to revive Venezuela\u2019s oil production?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Restoring Venezuela\u2019s oil output to historical levels would require staggering investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production, which once reached 3.5 million barrels per day in the 1970s, fell to around 1 million barrels per day last year \u2014 roughly 1% of global output. According to Rystad Energy, returning production to just 2 million barrels per day by the early 2030s would require about $110 billion in investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jorge Le\u00f3n, head of geopolitical analysis<\/a> at Rystad, said he doubts companies will rush back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBefore rushing back into the country, companies will want to see the country is stable enough,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said, noting lingering fears from the Ch\u00e1vez-era nationalisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would oil companies really take the risk?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question whether American oil giants will actively pursue investments in Venezuela has analysts divided. Le\u00f3n stated that the world was facing an era of oversupply for its oil markets, which translates to plummeting oil prices. Such conditions make it likely for investors to be quite selective, considering they would much rather invest in places they already know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But others see Venezuela as a rare prize. Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, said the country represents \u201ca huge opportunity\u201d and predicted intense competition among oil majors for the best assets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere will be immense competition between them,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Were oil executives consulted before the strike?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s confidence has led some analysts to believe oil executives may have been consulted ahead of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMy hunch is that, if President Trump said this publicly, probably there was already an agreement with the US companies,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Le\u00f3n said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The White House, however, declined to say whether it spoke with US oil firms before the operation. Politico reported<\/a> that administration officials recently told oil executives that compensation for seized assets would require returning to Venezuela and investing heavily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has hailed the January 3 operation as \u201cone of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence\u201d in history. But in corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals alike, memories of post-regime-change chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya loom large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe history of post-authoritarian transitions is long and non-linear,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Fordham warned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cTrump appears to have complete faith that, under him, things will be different.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whether US oil giants share that confidence \u2014 or are willing to bet billions on it \u2014 remains an open question.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US oil majors silent on Trump\u2019s claim of billions in Venezuelan investment","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-oil-majors-silent-on-trumps-claim-of-billions-in-venezuelan-investment","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:29:50","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10101","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n
\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n
\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies. https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Where are Republicans in condemning the conspiracy theories?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Leaders from the Democratic Party have also emphasized that \"the suspect accused in these shootings had a reputation for indulging in, as well as disseminating, conspiracy theories.\" Through spreading these kinds of theories, Trump is essentially tapping into the \"ideology that led to these tragic events<\/a>.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where are Republicans in condemning the conspiracy theories?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Minnesota House Democratic leader Zack Stephenson was quick to point out that Hortman and Walz were good allies and that any suggestion otherwise was an obvious lie. Stephenson stated that leaders who fail to denounce Trump's post would be unsuited for public office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Leaders from the Democratic Party have also emphasized that \"the suspect accused in these shootings had a reputation for indulging in, as well as disseminating, conspiracy theories.\" Through spreading these kinds of theories, Trump is essentially tapping into the \"ideology that led to these tragic events<\/a>.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where are Republicans in condemning the conspiracy theories?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

What does Trump\u2019s post mean for political norms and public safety?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Minnesota House Democratic leader Zack Stephenson was quick to point out that Hortman and Walz were good allies and that any suggestion otherwise was an obvious lie. Stephenson stated that leaders who fail to denounce Trump's post would be unsuited for public office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Leaders from the Democratic Party have also emphasized that \"the suspect accused in these shootings had a reputation for indulging in, as well as disseminating, conspiracy theories.\" Through spreading these kinds of theories, Trump is essentially tapping into the \"ideology that led to these tragic events<\/a>.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where are Republicans in condemning the conspiracy theories?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum said the president was \u201cdegrading the Office of the President by engaging in an outrageous lie,\u201d while Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy described the post as \u201csoulless,\u201d stressing that lies about political assassinations put real people at risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does Trump\u2019s post mean for political norms and public safety?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Minnesota House Democratic leader Zack Stephenson was quick to point out that Hortman and Walz were good allies and that any suggestion otherwise was an obvious lie. Stephenson stated that leaders who fail to denounce Trump's post would be unsuited for public office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Leaders from the Democratic Party have also emphasized that \"the suspect accused in these shootings had a reputation for indulging in, as well as disseminating, conspiracy theories.\" Through spreading these kinds of theories, Trump is essentially tapping into the \"ideology that led to these tragic events<\/a>.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where are Republicans in condemning the conspiracy theories?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Other Democratic officials echoed that warning, arguing that Trump\u2019s rhetoric reopens wounds from the attacks and increases fear among public officials already on edge amid rising political violence nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum said the president was \u201cdegrading the Office of the President by engaging in an outrageous lie,\u201d while Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy described the post as \u201csoulless,\u201d stressing that lies about political assassinations put real people at risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does Trump\u2019s post mean for political norms and public safety?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Minnesota House Democratic leader Zack Stephenson was quick to point out that Hortman and Walz were good allies and that any suggestion otherwise was an obvious lie. Stephenson stated that leaders who fail to denounce Trump's post would be unsuited for public office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Leaders from the Democratic Party have also emphasized that \"the suspect accused in these shootings had a reputation for indulging in, as well as disseminating, conspiracy theories.\" Through spreading these kinds of theories, Trump is essentially tapping into the \"ideology that led to these tragic events<\/a>.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where are Republicans in condemning the conspiracy theories?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although most Minnesota Republicans have been silent on the situation, a few members have come forward. \u201cI felt the impulse to speak out against the conspiracy theories being perpetrated in the name of people who deserved respect and honor,\u201d Minnesota State Sen. Julia Coleman said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou\u2019re disrespecting their families,\u201d Coleman added, suggesting that such allegations undermine even rudimentary common sense and civic stewardship. Nevertheless, the fact that there has been little overall Republican censure has provoked criticism, as Trump and other Republicans continue to target Minnesota as part of their plan to undermine Walz politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is the controversy tied to wider political battles in Minnesota?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The revival of conspiracy theories about the circumstances around Hortman's killing also coincides with Walz getting politically hammered over fraud cases on his watch, including the Feeding Our Future nutrition aid scheme that has led to dozens of federal prosecutions. Analysts<\/a> point out that the Trump post fits in to a broader effort to discredit Walz by any means necessary, even if that means exploiting a deadly attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To critics, the strategy blurs the line between aggressive political opposition and the wholesale erosion of truth that in some cases can have lethal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this episode reveal about the state of U.S. politics?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This dilemma highlights an increasing concern over the use of social networking sites by political leaders as tools to avoid accountability and spread misinformation. Posting an assassination conspiracy theory-linking video for many onlookers may well represent an intensification by Donald Trump that favors his political attacks over public safety issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the families of the victims call for basic decency and restraint, the scene begs the question of just how low political discourse in this country can sink before the words are likely to lead to violent actions again.<\/p>\n","post_title":"What Trump\u2019s Hortman post reveals about disinformation in power","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"what-trumps-hortman-post-reveals-about-disinformation-in-power","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_modified_gmt":"2026-01-06 11:37:55","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=10117","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":10101,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_date_gmt":"2026-01-04 17:27:57","post_content":"\n

Major US oil companies have so far remained conspicuously silent after President Donald Trump claimed they are ready to spend \u201cbillions and billions of dollars\u201d rebuilding Venezuela\u2019s oil industry following the January 3 military operation that removed President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has publicly suggested that American energy multinationals would be central to Washington\u2019s plans to control, manage, and even \u201crun\u201d Venezuela\u2019s oil sector. Yet no major US oil company has confirmed such commitments, and lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning the legality, intent, and endgame of the administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are US oil companies really prepared to invest billions?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite Trump\u2019s confident assertions, responses from US oil firms have been muted at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevron \u2014 the only major US oil company still operating in Venezuela \u2014 said it would merely continue to follow \u201crelevant laws and regulations,\u201d offering no endorsement of Trump\u2019s vision.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for Chevron said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cChevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

ExxonMobil, the largest US oil producer, did not respond to requests for comment, while ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but that it was \u201cpremature to speculate\u201d about future investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump, speaking at Mar-a-Lago, painted a far more ambitious picture. He said US companies would rebuild Venezuela\u2019s \u201crotted\u201d oil infrastructure, ramp up production, and sell \u201clarge amounts\u201d of oil globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going to have our very large United States oil companies \u2014 the biggest anywhere in the world \u2014 go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure and start making money for the country,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump said, adding that the companies would be \u201creimbursed,\u201d without explaining how.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who authorised the US to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela\u2019s oil industry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s remarks have triggered sharp criticism on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are questioning both the constitutional authority and policy rationale behind the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senator Chris Van Hollen, writing on January 4, 2026, openly challenged the idea that the United States should be \u201crunning\u201d Venezuela, warning that Trump\u2019s priorities appear focused on enriching elites rather than addressing domestic crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt a time when he\u2019s caused healthcare & other costs to skyrocket here at home, Trump bailed out Argentina & wants to \u2018run\u2019 Venezuela, including if necessary, w\/ US boots on the ground,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Hollen wrote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll he cares abt is enriching himself, big bankers, oil CEOs & the rest of his billionaire pals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: you can\u2019t both claim this was simply the execution of an arrest warrant AND say the U.S. is now "running" Venezuela & grabbing its oil resources.

Trump just admitted this was a clear regime-change play to enrich U.S. oil companies & his billionaire buddies.
https:\/\/t.co\/sIZJndhdHV<\/a><\/p>— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) January 3, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n
\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this. https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n
\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

The children of Melissa and Mark Hortman, along with Yvette Hoffman, issued emotional statements condemning Trump\u2019s post and urging its removal. They described the content as both false and deeply harmful, particularly given that it reused Melissa Hortman\u2019s own words in a misleading context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

How have the victims\u2019 families responded to Trump\u2019s claims?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The children of Melissa and Mark Hortman, along with Yvette Hoffman, issued emotional statements condemning Trump\u2019s post and urging its removal. They described the content as both false and deeply harmful, particularly given that it reused Melissa Hortman\u2019s own words in a misleading context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Prosecutors say Boelter called on the homes of more than a few Democratic legislators and had a list of politicians and leaders of organizations in favor of abortion rights. Boelter pleaded not guilty to the charges and is currently in jail awaiting a federal trial. The alleged perpetrator dabbled in conspiracy theories, concurring kinds of which Trump\u2019s post seemed to condone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How have the victims\u2019 families responded to Trump\u2019s claims?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The children of Melissa and Mark Hortman, along with Yvette Hoffman, issued emotional statements condemning Trump\u2019s post and urging its removal. They described the content as both false and deeply harmful, particularly given that it reused Melissa Hortman\u2019s own words in a misleading context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

Melissa and her husband, a former speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives, had been shot and killed this past summer in what is believed to be a targeted attack. The perpetrator, a man named Vance Boelter, is accused of shooting and failing to kill Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, the same evening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prosecutors say Boelter called on the homes of more than a few Democratic legislators and had a list of politicians and leaders of organizations in favor of abortion rights. Boelter pleaded not guilty to the charges and is currently in jail awaiting a federal trial. The alleged perpetrator dabbled in conspiracy theories, concurring kinds of which Trump\u2019s post seemed to condone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How have the victims\u2019 families responded to Trump\u2019s claims?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The children of Melissa and Mark Hortman, along with Yvette Hoffman, issued emotional statements condemning Trump\u2019s post and urging its removal. They described the content as both false and deeply harmful, particularly given that it reused Melissa Hortman\u2019s own words in a misleading context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

What actually happened in the Hortman and Hoffman shootings?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Melissa and her husband, a former speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives, had been shot and killed this past summer in what is believed to be a targeted attack. The perpetrator, a man named Vance Boelter, is accused of shooting and failing to kill Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, the same evening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prosecutors say Boelter called on the homes of more than a few Democratic legislators and had a list of politicians and leaders of organizations in favor of abortion rights. Boelter pleaded not guilty to the charges and is currently in jail awaiting a federal trial. The alleged perpetrator dabbled in conspiracy theories, concurring kinds of which Trump\u2019s post seemed to condone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How have the victims\u2019 families responded to Trump\u2019s claims?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The children of Melissa and Mark Hortman, along with Yvette Hoffman, issued emotional statements condemning Trump\u2019s post and urging its removal. They described the content as both false and deeply harmful, particularly given that it reused Melissa Hortman\u2019s own words in a misleading context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n

The piece is part of an escalating continuum of Trump actions attacking Walz politically, as he is now running for his third term as governor. It is seen that Trump\u2019s readiness to spread misinformation regarding an attack, especially one that is deadly, is part of his design to use tragedies to his advantage politically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What actually happened in the Hortman and Hoffman shootings?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Melissa and her husband, a former speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives, had been shot and killed this past summer in what is believed to be a targeted attack. The perpetrator, a man named Vance Boelter, is accused of shooting and failing to kill Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, the same evening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prosecutors say Boelter called on the homes of more than a few Democratic legislators and had a list of politicians and leaders of organizations in favor of abortion rights. Boelter pleaded not guilty to the charges and is currently in jail awaiting a federal trial. The alleged perpetrator dabbled in conspiracy theories, concurring kinds of which Trump\u2019s post seemed to condone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How have the victims\u2019 families responded to Trump\u2019s claims?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The children of Melissa and Mark Hortman, along with Yvette Hoffman, issued emotional statements condemning Trump\u2019s post and urging its removal. They described the content as both false and deeply harmful, particularly given that it reused Melissa Hortman\u2019s own words in a misleading context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI am asking President Trump to remove the video that he shared and apologize to me and my family for posting this misinformation and for using my mother\u2019s own words to dishonor her memory,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

said Collin Hortman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His sister, Sophie Hortman, warned that the video promotes<\/a> a fabricated narrative that inflames political division at a time when their family is still grieving its first holiday season without their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe must create a society in which we do not harbor hatred and violence toward our political opponents,\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvette Hoffman was even more blunt, calling the president\u2019s post \u201cabsolute bull\u2014\u201d and accusing Trump of endangering families by spreading reckless misinformation from the highest office in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Democratic leaders warning of broader consequences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Top Minnesota Democrats reacted swiftly, framing Trump\u2019s actions not merely as offensive but as dangerous. Governor Tim Walz condemned the post as \u201cdepraved behavior\u201d from a sitting president and accused Trump of covering for a serial killer by validating the conspiratorial worldview that motivated the violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dangerous, depraved behavior from the sitting president of the United States. In covering for an actual serial killer, he is going to get more innocent people killed.

America is better than this.
https:\/\/t.co\/sgkP0jwNn2<\/a><\/p>— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) January 4, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>

\n